This comes to the aid of people having a lesser degree of understanding. However, from the point of view of usability, it is the simplicity of Bento that makes it so popular, as it allows the users to create a truly professional looking database with ease.
#Difference between filemaker pro 6 and 6v4 pro
Again, FM Pro is more powerful than Bento in robustness. On the other hand, FM is capable of handling an unlimited number of users with the FM server across a vast region.įrom the users’ point of view, BN is not as customizable as FM. Nevertheless, FM comes with a string of options that help it to get compatible with MS Office and make an array of functions like creating emails, accessing the internet browsers, adding various functionalities with the plugins, creating various web and internet solutions with the help of PHP, accessing various other external SQL databases.īento also restricts the total number of shared users to those who are present on any local network and the number also should not exceed 5. FileMaker, on the other hand is designed to link up with all these tools, though there is still room for development through plugins or Applescript.
#Difference between filemaker pro 6 and 6v4 mac os
On the other hand, FM works on Mac OS as well as Windows.īN is designed to integrate directly with the Address Book from Apple for contacts, iCal for the purpose of Calendars, Mails for the purpose of e-mails, iPhoto for the purpose of photos or images, and the likes. It is only compatible with Mac, which runs Leopard 10.5.7 or beyond. Technically speaking, Bento does not work across multi platforms (as it is not cross platform).
By default, the data sources of Bento include Address Book as well as Calendar applications from Apple that can be directly customized or modified to fit in the requirements or the needs of the clients.
Bento, on the other hand, significantly differs from FM in the sense that it heavily depends upon the templates as well as integrations with the other applications.
0 kommentar(er)
